
DBTA Big Data 75: Companies Driving Innovation in 2025
In the News: Nexla is featured on DBTA Big Data Quarterly’s 2025 “Big Data 75,” recognized among the innovators driving progress in data collection, storage, and analytics.
Choosing a data integration platform is a strategic decision with direct impact on time-to-insight, operating cost, and governance. Pick well, and analytics, ML, and operations accelerate. Pick poorly and you inherit technical debt, higher TCO, and stalled execution.
Gartner estimates that organizations lose an average of $12.9 million annually due to poor data quality. That is why modern data teams require more than data movement. Integration is not just about linking systems, but also about making complex data manageable through discipline, quality, and scale.
Fivetran and Nexla are two of the most recognized platforms in this space. Fivetran focuses on simplicity, automation, and prebuilt connectors. Nexla emphasizes flexibility, governance, and support for custom pipelines. Both deliver strong capabilities, but in different ways.
In this article, we will compare Fivetran and Nexla through core features, deployment options, and when to choose each.
Data integration platforms functionality defines how teams can use, govern, and scale their data. Some platforms use simple, standardized patterns. Others focus on flexibility for complex enterprise environments. Let’s have a look:
Fivetran is built on an ELT (Extract, Load, Transform) model, designed to automate the flow of data into centralized cloud warehouses. Its workflow is straightforward:
This minimizes the need for complex engineering, providing teams with an easy deployment path with minimal overhead. Once configured, Fivetran operates in the background, sending data in batches at regular intervals.
Fivetran offers a robust and stable platform to organizations that rely on a warehouse to perform analytics. Data teams spend less time maintaining pipelines and more time analyzing and deriving insights.
Nexla frames integration as an enterprise-scale data fabric. Its AI-powered data fabric architecture supports multiple integration modes and adapts to both real-time and batch data needs.
Instead of transferring data in a single direction, Nexla links systems in all directions, allowing ongoing, multi-directional integration. Teams view Nexla more as an orchestration layer than a simple pipeline tool. It actively manages, transforms, and governs data during its journey.
This strategy is especially powerful for modern enterprises, linking analytics, operations, compliance, and collaboration. Nexla brings together flexibility and good governance, making data a governed asset that delivers value throughout the organization.
Each platform brings unique strengths. Let’s break down the key differences between Fivetran vs Nexla:
Feature Category | ![]() |
![]() |
---|---|---|
AI & Automation | No AI-driven orchestration or intelligent mapping. | AI-powered workflows, metadata intelligence. |
Integration Modes | ELT (batch CDC, replication via HVR). | Full integration: ELT, ETL, reverse ETL, CDC, streaming, API, (S)FTP, API proxy. |
Connector Breadth | ~250+ core connectors, 300+ lite/API connectors; harder to extend. | 500+ bidirectional connectors across all data types, auto-generative. |
Data Movement Topology | One-way ELT only. | Bidirectional read/write. |
Latency & Performance | Batches at 1 / 5 / 15+ min intervals. | Real-time, any interval, high throughput. |
Data Variety Supported | Structured/relational mapping only. | Any: structured, semi-structured, unstructured. |
Data Products | No concept of reusable data products. | Yes: Nexsets (metadata-rich, reusable fragments). |
Data Governance | Schema evolution only; metadata via Platform Connector. | Rich: validation, lineage, approvals, RBAC, PII tagging, audit trails. |
Monitoring & Metadata | Platform Connector adds lineage, logs, usage metadata. | Continuous monitoring, alerting, audit logs, data ops optimized. |
Deployment Options | SaaS, limited private, self-hosted HVR. | SaaS, private, hybrid, self-hosted. |
Extensibility | SDK exists; limited customization. | High: custom connectors, workflows, metadata. |
Cost & ROI | Higher cost; strong ROI via productivity. | Medium cost; 30-50% lower deployment costs; 2x lower infrastructure/staff costs; 10x productivity gains. |
Ease of Use | High (no-code), simple. | High (no-code + AI). More flexible. |
Productivity Gains | High, but limited flexibility. | Very high: 10x faster connector creation, 40x faster time to insight. |
Hybrid / On-Prem Support | Private deployment options exist. | Hybrid connectors and distributed processing. |
Architecture | ELT-centric. | Distributed, containerized, optimized for streaming and low latency. |
Security & Compliance | HITRUST, GovCloud, metadata for audit/compliance. | RBAC, audit trails, PII detection, masking, integration with governance tools. |
Support & Reliability | High reliability (1-min syncs, 99.9% uptime). | Very reliable; optimized execution engines, comprehensive monitoring. |
Reverse ETL Support | Limited; HVR bundled but not integrated. | Native R-ETL support via metadata-aware architecture. |
Beyond technical performance, the financial model of a platform plays a decisive role in long-term adoption and scalability. Let’s take a closer look at the pricing models of Fivetran and Nexla:
Fivetran operates on a Monthly Active Rows (MAR) usage-based pricing model. This monitors the unique primary keys that are synced per connector monthly. It means you won’t be charged extra if the same row updates multiple times in a month.
Fivetran has modified its pricing as of March 1, 2025. Rather than having a tiered approach to account-level discounts, the MAR of each connector is now charged separately. This adjustment eliminates multiple-connector account bulk-discount advantages. Such arrangements tend to be expensive and complicate billing, especially with mixed connectors.
Nexla has simple usage-based pricing in tiers, including Pro, Team, and Enterprise, which scales to fit organizations of different sizes and requirements. The model allows customers to increase their usage and costs gradually as their needs expand.
Thanks to its transparent pricing, Nexla provides 30 to 50% cost savings over Fivetran. This allows the customers to consolidate tools, reduce infrastructure and staffing costs, and in some cases, deliver up to 10x ROI.
To understand how these platforms operate in practice, it is essential to examine their deployment models and reliability. Both factors directly influence performance, control, and long-term scalability.
Fivetran supports three main deployment models:
Fivetran guarantees 99.9% uptime for Enterprise and Business Critical plans.
Nexla also provides flexible deployment options, including SaaS, hybrid multi-cloud, and on-premises setups. These can be hosted in private clouds or customer VPCs.
It separates the control plane, which handles orchestration, from the data planes. Data planes can be distributed across AWS, GCP, or Azure environments.
The platform is built on containerized microservices. This architecture allows auto-scaling, self-healing, and enterprise-level reliability. Nexla also offers SSO, audit logs, role-based access control, advanced governance, and strong encryption.
The decision to use Nexla or Fivetran should be based on the data priorities, size, and integration requirements of your organization. Although the two platforms are at the forefront of integration, their working models are very different.
Let’s discuss which platform may be suitable for you, depending on your needs:
Nexla is ideal for enterprises that need flexibility, governance, and scalability in their integration strategy. Its architecture is flexible in terms of various integration modes, and it focuses on flexibility in different environments. This is where Nexla excels:
Nexla supports structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. It integrates with APIs, files, databases, and event streams, without constraining teams to pre-packaged connectors. Custom connectors can eliminate integration backlogs, and new data sources can be integrated immediately.
Nexla combines various integration styles into a single solution. A team may require ELT for analytics, ETL for processing, reverse-ETL to feed operational systems, real-time streaming of dynamic data, or legacy protocols such as file transfer protocol (FTP). Nexla supports all of these integration modes within a single platform.
In addition to these core modes, Nexla further expands on flexibility by serving as an API proxy. This feature allows teams to discover and use APIs directly on the platform. It enables both operational and analytical use cases without switching tools.
Validation rules maintain data accuracy before downstream movement. The lineage tracking provides complete visibility of pipelines, whereas approval workflow and RBAC (role-based access control) provide additional layers of governance.
These features enable enterprises to comply with regulations and ensure internal compliance without creating bottlenecks.
Nexla offers transparent pricing with predictable costs compared to usage-based models, which can spike unexpectedly. This removes the uncertainty of scaling and assists the enterprises in planning the budget more efficiently.
Customers document significant ROI benefits on cost savings and efficiency improvements because they need fewer tools and less operational overhead.
Nexla is designed to run high-volume production workloads with a robust, containerized microservices architecture that provides auto-scaling and auto-healing. Data pipelines are efficient and reliable because they are monitored in real-time with automated error detection.
Together with the hybrid and multi-cloud deployment support, these capabilities provide enterprise-level performance and uptime even in the most challenging conditions.
Fivetran is the preferred option for organizations that value simplicity and speed when it comes to the development of analytics pipelines. Its SaaS-first approach, along with a rich connector ecosystem, allows data teams to be productive in minutes without dealing with infrastructure. Let’s see when Fivetran is a good option:
This is where Fivetran can be used:
Fivetran uses a fully-managed ELT architecture, extracting and loading data into cloud warehouses, where transformations are performed natively with SQL or dbt.
It also automatically handles schema changes, like detecting and supporting new or dropped columns and other structural adjustments. This decreases the need for manual work and keeps the platform resilient even when source schemas evolve.
The platform is designed to support centralized analytics environments. Fivetran can keep data streaming into Snowflake, BigQuery, or Redshift, so that analysts always have consistent and up-to-date data to use in dashboards and reports.
Fivetran is a fully managed SaaS product. There are no servers to maintain, no infrastructure to set up, and no maintenance overhead. Teams only need to configure connectors once, and the platform does the rest, which is attractive to organizations with limited engineering bandwidth.
Fivetran pipelines are set to run on a batch rather than a streaming basis. This is a predictable pattern, which is perfect for BI and reporting loads, where the stability and consistency are more important than the speed of data.
Fivetran provides one of the largest connector ecosystems in the market with 700+ pre-built connectors to SaaS applications, databases, and cloud services. This significantly reduces the need for custom integrations.
In situations when no connector is available, you can use the Connector SDK to develop custom integrations with automatic schema updates, incremental syncs, and built-in logging.
Fivetran and Nexla take different paths when it comes to integration. Fivetran is fast and simple, and its ELT-first design excels in centralized, batch-oriented analytics. It is the expressway to teams that desire predictable pipelines with a low overhead.
Nexla is built to be adaptable and scale-governed. Its data fabric links systems in real time, orchestrates bi-directional flows, and governs without hindering teams.
The best step before deploying is to run a proof of concept (POC). Test actual sources, destinations, and workloads. Discover which platform provides the reliability, compliance, and cost that you expect.
Are you ready to move beyond pipelines and open up governed, enterprise-wide integration? Find out what Nexla can do.
In the News: Nexla is featured on DBTA Big Data Quarterly’s 2025 “Big Data 75,” recognized among the innovators driving progress in data collection, storage, and analytics.
Dive into Apache Iceberg’s benefits. Reliable pipelines need strong operations, from catalog options to lakehouses. Learn about time travel, schema evolution, and best practices for scalable maintenance with Nexla.
Most data teams waste time fixing brittle pipelines instead of driving insights. See how AI-powered transformation and Nexla’s Common Data Model cut manual work and ensure scalable pipelines.