

Nexla contributes key innovations from its cutting-edge agentic AI framework to the open source community, reinforcing its commitment to advancing enterprise-grade AI technology.
In today’s data-driven world, organizations are increasingly relying on data integration to manage, move, and connect their vast troves of data. While building your own platform may seem like an attractive option, it often presents many challenges that outweigh the benefits. Let’s compare the potential risks and benefits of:
(1) building everything from scratch,
(2) customizing a paid solution so data engineers can build a tailored solution, or
(3) buying & adopting a data platform outright from a vendor.
In the middle of adopting a paid solution and building wholly in-house, companies with specific needs and requirements can also explore combining and customizing paid platforms with their own code. This way, in-house data engineers are focusing on value add for specific use cases rather than reinventing the wheel for every aspect of data integration. This may comprise of solutions like Airflow, dbt, or Glue combined with a data integration platform solution to orchestrate complex flows, apply custom transformations, or trigger a series of pre-built flows when an action occurs. This can result in all the benefits of a paid solution while enabling engineers to automate the time-consuming tasks like setting up, building, and testing data pipelines. However – if considering this route, also be wary of choosing tools that actually aid your engineers, not hold them back. Look for data integration platforms that support external integrations to services like Airflow, Glue, and dbt, with support for data engineering customization like custom Python code, a well-documented API library, and even a CLI for scripting.
Purchasing and adopting a data integration platform can often solve most if not all of the data integration challenges in a company. Today there are tools on the market that enable companies to solve their data integration challenges with flexibility and ease, while reducing cost. Data integration platforms have evolved to tailor to most of the needs of even the most ambitious data engineers, accelerating their work without holding them back.
Once you’ve decided to explore options in the market for purchasing a data platform, whether to customize with in-house code or fully adopt, here are some practical guidelines for building your case to internal stakeholders.
We can conduct a simple back-of-the-envelope analysis to see that in all but most unique cases, the costs often far outweigh the benefits of building. Between the extra full-time data engineers required as well as steeper infrastructure and maintenance costs, whatever perceived downsides of a purchased solution pale in comparison.
Approach | Benefits | Risks | Overall Cost | Time to Production |
Build In-House | Completely custom for the business | High costs and time-consuming; reinventing the wheel | 💸💸💸 | ⏱️⏱️⏱️ |
Customize a Platform Solution | Allow for custom code while automating most of the work | In-house engineering bandwidth | 💸💸 | ⏱️⏱️ |
Adopt a Pre-built Platform Solution | Frees up bandwidth for in-house engineers to focus on business needs; scalability, flexibility, and support | May limit customization for specialized use cases | 💸 | ⏱️ |
Building a data platform from scratch can be a costly and time-consuming endeavor, often diverting resources from core business functions. By purchasing a data platform from a reputable provider, organizations can gain access to proven technology, comprehensive support, and rapid deployment, empowering them to harness the power of their data and drive business success.
Discover how Nexla’s powerful data operations can put an end to your data challenges with our free demo.