Harnessing the Power of Data Mesh and Data Fabric in Data Architecture

Unlocking the future of data management hinges on two pivotal concepts: data meshes and data fabrics. These groundbreaking frameworks are revolutionizing the landscape of data architectures. Often misunderstood as competing concepts, mainly because of the fact that a “fabric” is a “mesh” of threads, the fact is Data Fabric and Data Mesh work well together, where Data Fabric’s metadata-based approach helps create Data Products, an essential component of the Data Mesh.

In this article, we’ll first define what data meshes and data fabrics are, highlighting their unique benefits and impacts. Next, we will explore the intriguing ways these two methodologies can complement each other in a modern data pipeline. Finally, we’ll delve into the challenges you might face—and how to overcome them—when implementing both.

What is a data fabric?

Data fabric is an architectural approach based on technologies like metadata intelligence, knowledge graphs,  and machine learning to deliver flexible, reusable, and automated data pipelines. Applying the Data Fabric architecture also helps to create a layer of data products that can abstract and unify the data across various sources.  

Imagine a data fabric as the city’s central command and control center. This center integrates data and actions from each sector—traffic, waste, emergency services, and so on—into a unified, responsive system. The data fabric ensures seamless data flow and automated intelligent decision-making across all sector domains.

Nexla’s data fabric architecture promotes universal and central access to its Nexset data products.

What is a data mesh?

A data mesh is a decentralized approach to data architecture and data platforms that shifts the ownership to the domain team rather than the centralized data team. As above, think of the various city management services like traffic management, waste management, and emergency response. To manage these services effectively, data is split between various service domains that maintain their data specific to that service. These domains are known as data products. 

For instance, the traffic management team could offer a data product that provides real-time traffic updates. The emergency services team could use these updates to optimize routes for ambulances. 

This decentralized approach reduces dependencies on engineering and promotes domain-specific, ready-to-use products.

How data meshes and data fabrics work together

While a data fabric works to centralize and streamline data management, a data mesh innovates by decentralizing data ownership, shifting it from a single, centralized team to domain-specific teams within an organization. Though they may initially seem like contrasting approaches, the data mesh’s decentralized nature can enhance the data fabric’s centralized capabilities. In practice, domain-specific teams within a data mesh framework can curate and manage their own data sets, which feed into an overarching data fabric architecture.

Let’s build on the city management services analogy introduced earlier. We considered the control room as the data fabric: This hub aggregates and analyzes data from various city services to monitor traffic flows, forecast congestion, and send out city-wide advisories. Conversely, individual transit sectors, representing data mesh domains, operate autonomously, each managing its own specialized data.

In emergency scenarios, such as a multi-car accident, these two systems come together synergistically. The control room (data fabric) can distribute a city-wide traffic advisory quickly. At the same time, the transit sectors (data mesh domains) can make immediate adjustments based on their real-time, localized data, like rerouting buses or scheduling extra subway services. This scenario is a perfect example of how a data mesh and data fabric can work together in a real-world scenario. 

This decentralized approach reduces dependencies on engineering and promotes domain-specific, ready-to-use products (Source: Nexla)

Best practices for integrating data mesh and data fabric architectures

Having examined the concepts of data mesh and data fabric and explored how they synergize, let’s now pivot to implementing these concepts in real-world scenarios. In the table below, you will find best practices that will help guide you on this journey. This table details the key areas to focus on, the methods to adopt depending on your chosen approach, and why these practices are beneficial.

In the sections below, we look in detail at how data fabrics and meshes contribute to an efficient data management ecosystem and explore methods to implement them effectively. 

Data governance 

• Data mesh approach: Decentralization allows each domain to have policies tailored to its specific needs. Using a data mesh, each domain can define the governance that suits its operational tempo and regulatory requirements. 
• Data fabric approach: A data fabric architecture would have overarching governance policies that ensure compliance across all domains. This can be beneficial in scenarios where data from different domains needs to be integrated for organization-wide analytics while still maintaining data quality and compliance.
• Example: Think of a healthcare domain that has strict data retention policies compared to a marketing domain in the same organization. A data mesh architecture allows for decentralized, separate retention policies for each data product domain. On the flip side, by leveraging the centralized architecture of data fabrics, a healthcare organization can seamlessly enforce HIPAA compliance standards across all of its data products.
• Benefits: This blended governance model combines the best of both worlds: It allows specific domains to address their unique regulatory and operational needs while a unified policy framework ensures organization-wide compliance and consistent data quality. It’s a strategy that fosters agility and customization at the domain level. Additionally, this approach harmonizes standards and oversight at the global level, thus streamlining compliance, enhancing data integrity, and reducing security risks. 

Components of data governance (Source: BP Consulting)

Data discovery and cataloging

• Data mesh approach: Decentralized data catalogs allow each domain to list and manage its own datasets, making them more accessible to the teams that directly benefit from them. 
• Data fabric approach: In contrast to the data mesh, a unified data catalog serves as a centralized repository that lists all the data available across an organization. 
• Example: Think of how a global retail chain could use data mesh principles to let each store maintain a catalog of its inventory and sales data. In parallel, the corporate office can use a data fabric to track overall performance and inventory needs across the entire data catalog. 
• Benefits: This dual approach empowers teams with immediate access to pertinent data, enhancing agility and informed decision-making at the domain level. Simultaneously, it provides leadership with a consolidated view that supports strategic planning and global resource optimization. Here, data meshes and data fabrics create a balance between local flexibility and global oversight. 

Real-time data processing

• Data mesh approach: Leveraging data mesh techniques to apply an event-driven architecture within domains allows for immediate responsiveness to local data events. 
• Data fabric approach: On the other hand, a data fabric provides a real-time data integration layer that provides a holistic view of your data products. This approach enables quick decision-making on a much larger scale. 
• Example: Imagine an e-commerce company that uses a data mesh to handle real-time inventory updates at the individual warehouse level. At the same time, the e-commerce company uses a data fabric architecture to integrate this data for a real-time view of global inventory across all warehouses. 
• Benefits: Integrating these methodologies enables business units to autonomously manage and measure inventory through a decentralized approach, ensuring that critical data remains directly accessible to those who need it. Concurrently, it grants global inventory management teams a comprehensive overview, offering strategic insights into the entire inventory landscape.

Data quality management

• Data mesh approach: With a data mesh, local data quality checks can be finely tuned to align with the particular nuances of each data domain. 
• Data fabric approach: A centralized data fabric approach to data quality ensures consistency and reliability across all data assets, especially when data from multiple domains is aggregated for integration purposes. 
• Example: By leveraging a data mesh, a pharmaceutical company could manage its research domains by implementing quality checks according to experimental protocols. On the other hand, a data fabric ensures that the drug efficacy data is reliable across all research teams. 
• Benefits: Combining the data mesh’s domain-specific quality checks with the data fabric’s centralized oversight creates a layered quality assurance framework. This ensures data integrity at both the granular and global levels, providing trust and consistency in data-driven decisions across the entire organization. 

Guide to Metadata-Driven Integration

Free Download

• 
  
  
  Learn how to overcome constraints in the evolving data integration landscape
• 
  
  
  Shift data architecture fundamentals to a metadata-driven design
• 
  
  
  Implement metadata in your data flows to deliver data at time-of-use

Scalability

• Data mesh approach: By focusing on domain-specific scalability, organizations can ensure that each data product can handle its load without overengineering for less busy domains. 
• Data fabric approach: A data fabric scales at the infrastructure level, providing elastic resources to meet the needs of the data workloads across the organization.
• Example: Think of a media streaming service utilizing a data mesh for scaling user data processing during regional peak hours, while a data fabric would scale content delivery networks to handle global demand spikes. 
• Benefits: The fusion of the data mesh and data fabric approaches allows for the targeted allocation of resources, ensuring that each domain’s growth can be accommodated without unnecessary resource expenditure. This strategic scalability facilitates sustainable growth and robust performance across the organization. 

Interoperability

• Data mesh approach: Standardized data formats within domains can streamline data integration efforts when working with other domains. 
• Data fabric approach: By harmonizing data formats across the organization, a data fabric simplifies data sharing and reduces transformation overhead.
• Example: A logistics company might adopt a data mesh to standardize shipping data formats across regional teams and use a data fabric to enable seamless tracking of packages worldwide. 
• Benefits: Standardizing data formats with a data mesh while ensuring harmonization with a data fabric minimizes the complexities of data exchange between domains. This not only accelerates collaboration and innovation but also significantly lowers the time and cost associated with data integration projects. 

Security and privacy

• Data mesh approach: A data mesh allows for localized data privacy measures, which can be essential when domains have specific regulatory requirements. 
• Data fabric approach: In the data fabric model, security protocols are centralized, simplifying the enforcement of corporate-wide security policies. 
• Example: A healthcare network can implement a data mesh to ensure that patient data within each hospital complies with local privacy laws, while a data fabric would centralize the protection of research data across the network. 
• Benefits: An integrated approach respects the need for localized control over sensitive data while adhering to diverse regulatory landscapes. Leveraging both data mesh and data fabric architectures, as in this case, allows the organization to implement and monitor security measures at scale. This ensures that data privacy is maintained without sacrificing the oversight needed in today’s cybersecurity environment. 

Powering data engineering automation

Free Strategy Session

Platform	Data Extraction	Data Warehousing	No-Code Automation	Auto-Generated Connectors	Data as a Product	Multi-Speed Data Integration
Informatica	+	+	-	-	-	-
Fivetran	+	+	+	-	-	-
Nexla	+	+	+	+	+	+

Conclusion

Integrating the data mesh and data fabric approaches provides a balanced framework for managing data at scale. By leveraging the strengths of each—the domain-oriented autonomy of a data mesh and the centralized integration capabilities of a data fabric—organizations can achieve a dynamic and robust data management ecosystem. As tech evolves, so too will these frameworks. However, the principles of good data governance, quality, and security will remain as guidelines on the journey to data maturity.